Good spellers

And I'm so gled I'm a Singaporian.

Kin Mun

Full article below -

Singapore kids spell better than AussiesJustine Ferrari,
ucation writer
July 27, 2006, The Australian.
THE "wallpaper method" of teaching spelling by sticking words on the classroom wall for
children to absorb is failing in Australia.
Writing tests conducted by the University of NSW reveal that about nine times more students in Singapore - where about half of children speak English as a second language - can spell
less-common English words or those with unusual spelling patterns.
The stark difference is attributed to the more traditional drill approach adopted by
Singapore schools to teach spelling, with the syllabus even listing words that
students are expected to be able to spell.
About 9 per cent of Year 3 students in Singapore could spell words such as chaotic, dilemma, laborious, perceive and voyage, while only 1 per cent of Year 3 students in NSW reached an
equivalent score.
The improvement in students' spelling over two years was also markedly different, with 36.5 per cent of Year 5 students in Singapore able to spell at the same level, compared with 12 per cent of Year 5 students in NSW.
The tests, conducted by Educational Assessment Australia at UNSW and involving more than 110,000 Australians and more than 10,000 Singaporeans, required students to construct a news story based on an event.
While the EAA students comprised a high proportion of private school students, the results are
similar to those of the NSW Government's basic skills tests, which are sat by all Year 3 and 5 students in government and non-government schools.
The 2003 results for the primary writing assessment of the NSW test show only 2 per cent
of Year 3 students and 11 per of Year 5 students composing a factual piece of writing could spell words such as actions, appearance, camouflage, disappeared, frightening, muscular and predators.
EAA director Peter Knapp attributed the difference in spelling capabilities to the teaching methods used, with Australian schools adopting a more progressive strategy that encourages teachers to teach spelling in context. fact results for the different tests in Australia and Singapore, and populations of students, were so similar suggested the problem was the way in which spelling was taught.
"I think it's definitely an issue of pedagogy and the absence of anything explicit in our
syllabus documents," Professor Knapp said. "Spelling is not a high-order cognitive skill such as sentence construction, however, it requires practice and memory - two aspects of traditional pedagogy that have somehow fallen out of favour.
"Teachers are encouraged to teach spelling in context, the wallpaper approach, that children absorb the spelling of words through reading them and saying them or looking at them on a classroom wall."
The chairman of the national inquiry into the teaching of literacy, Ken Rowe from the Australian
Council for Educational Research, said the secret of Singapore's success was its direct and explicit instruction.